Control

24/05/10

E-mails regarding the future of the regional control project - Click Here

16/05/10

Letter to the new Prime Minister From Matt Wrack Members cover letter - Click Here

Letter to the new Prime Minister - Click Here

16/02/10

CONTROL REGIONALISATION: SELECT COMMITTEE INQUIRY - Click Here

23/10/08

THE FIRE BRIGADES UNION

MEDIA RELEASE

Fire Brigades Union hits out over more delays and costs for £1.5 billion 999 IT project after Government admits it has hit major technical problems

The Fire Brigades Union has called for a complete review and overhaul of a 999 IT project after the Government was forced to admit it has hit major technical problems. It will mean further costs and delays for a Project Government said would use “tried and tested” technology, make massive savings and would be fully operational by November 2007.

That date was put back, and this latest admission comes only months before 999 emergency control staff were to start moving to new control rooms next June to start operating in October 2009. The Project, known as FireControl, was originally estimated to cost £100 million when it was first proposed.

The full Projects costs are now over £1.5 billion with more to come. This includes £278 million pounds ear-marked for an army of consultants, directors, PR staff, “change co-ordinators”, “project assurance” staff and agency staff.

The Project is based on closing all 46 emergency fire control rooms in England and moving to only 9 regional centres. Similar plans were rejected in Scotland and Wales.

The union has repeatedly accused the Government of diverting massive amounts of public money away from frontline fire services where it is desperately needed. The FBU says Firecontrol, is unnecessary, over budget and years late.

The union’s research, based on Parliamentary Questions and Departmental circulars shows:

+ £92.2 million has been ear-marked for regions and fire brigades to pay largely for additional staffing and associated projects costs between 2008 and 2011 including for regional directors, press officers, “change co-ordinators”, project assurance staff and for “redundancies, relocation and redeployments”.

+ £55.4 million going to management consultants, well above the last estimate of £36 million. By the end of June of this year, £38,571,512 had already been paid with a further £16.9 million more ear-marked for consultants by the end of the project.

+ £27, 885,926 was paid between 2005 and 2008 to fire brigades and regions to cover the additional staffing and associated costs of setting up the project.

+ £22 million had been paid by the Department until the end of June 2008 on those working on the project at national level including civil servants, contractors and agency staff (in addition to consultants).

In addition there are rental costs for the new 9 regional control centre buildings of at least £400 million. Rents are already being paid on many of the new buildings rented by Government on long leases.

Fire Brigades Union General Secretary Matt Wrack said: “This Project has lost all credibility within the fire service. Everyone else knows this Project is already a disaster but the Government wants to plough on regardless.

“Project turmoil has led to highly skilled staff leaving and serious damage to morale. The project is highly divisive in a fire service which is has built its very high public reputation on strong team working.

“Vast amounts of public money is being wasted on a project which is unnecessary, already three years late, massively over budget and with no guarantee it will work as claimed. The Government’s appalling track record of major IT-led projects is truly appalling and this is underlined by what is happening in the fire service.

“Money is being thrown away on management consultants, regional project directors, change co-ordinators, project assurance directors, PR and human resource directors. No one ever dialled 999 and asked for any of those.

“We’re short of firefighters in many brigades and in desperate need of more safety critical equipment and training at a time when firefighter deaths are at a 30-year high. Even a fraction of the money being wasted would make an enormous difference in every fire brigade.

“There needs to be a thorough public review of this entire project. A public service which provides a rapid response to save lives cannot be dealt with in this way.”

 

Press Report

South West Control

Fire authorities unlikely to shut down south west control centres

By Gazette Reporter

Fire authorities have warned fire minister Parmjit Dhanda that it is unlikely south west fire authorities will agree to shut down their local fire control centres and move to a regional centre in Taunton.

The message was given in a letter from the local government company set up to run the control centre and signed by Jerry Wilmott, chair of Wiltshire Fire authority on their behalf.

The Fire Brigades Union says it is well aware of growing concerns about the Project in other English regions since the Government admitted last week that the massive savings they promised will not emerge. The project is now years overdue, well over-budget and has not yet been operationally tested.

The Government plans to close all of England's 46 fire brigade emergency control centres and their back up controls and move to 9 regional controls.

The project costs, first estimated at costing £100 million, have risen to nearly £ 1.5 billion as it grew to include extra items such as renting new buildings.

But even this excludes a huge amount of extra work currently carried out in fire service controls at the moment. Fire authorities will either have to pay for this work to be contracted out or pay the new regional controls extra money for doing the work.

In a letter to fire minister Parmjit Dhanda, Jerry Willmott, Chair of South West Fire Control Service Ltd (the company set up by the fire authorities to run the controls) wrote on 8 July: "In essence, the message that I have been asked to convey is one of immense frustration, profound disappointment and an overall feeling of being let down once again by CLG failing to honour the promises that they make. We feel that our personal credibility is being compromised and that is absolutely unacceptable.

"With the exception of the Fire Brigades Union, who are watching their well predicted events unfold with relish, confidence amongst the company directors, our hard working officers and, we suspect, fire authorities is now rock bottom. Although we will cope with this setback, I need to advise you that our current perception is that it is highly unlikely that our client fire authorities will agree to move their operations into the RCC voluntarily. If it remains CLG's intention that this should occur, then you need to consider how this may be achieved in the face of this opposition.

In another blow, Terry Walker, chair of Avon Fire authority said of the FireControl Project in this month's Firefighter magazine: "This wrong-headed, lunatic project is a nonsense and will certainly be neither robust nor up to standard. What it will be is a call centre, not a control centre and we've already seen the disastrous way that's happened with the police: a lot of questions are asked rather than sending the people to do the job."

Matt Wrack, Fire Brigades Union General Secretary said: "This project is in complete disarray and the fault lies with the Government in Whitehall and not with fire authorities, fire officers or contractors. Apart from a few paid project cheerleaders, the fire service is thoroughly sick of the mayhem this project has caused.

"Central Government's ignorance of the fire service is matched by the arrogance it has displayed throughout this project. For the last 6 years they have refused to listen and act on the concerns we have raised.

"Fire crews are crying out for basic safety critical equipment and training at a time when firefighter deaths have reached a 30 year high. To respond by claiming SatNavs and GPS systems are critical and key pieces of equipment is both bewildering and irrelevant to the dangers faced by firefighters."

 

14/07/08 Governments Business case for regional controls